John Heathcote

Seán MacMathúna

Consulting editor: Themistocles Hoetis


British Jews stand against Zionism
Previous performance of play by DTG
More Lenni Brenner

Our Perdition review

Perdition review

Another review

Perdition comments




Lenni Brenner & the Dialogue Theatre Group's touring performances of Jim Allen's play, Perdition
LETTER To the Editor, The Wall Street Journal
Participation of the NMO in the War on the Side of Germany & commentary
Lenni Brenner - mp3 interview with Zionist collaborator with Nazis

Lenni Brenner & the Dialogue Theatre Group's touring performances of Jim Allen's play, Perdition

Sisters & brothers,

As many of you know, I'm going to Scotland in January for the Dialogue Theatre Group's touring performances of Jim Allen's play, Perdition.
I'll be giving lectures backing it up with the history of Zionist collaboration with Hitler.

Audiences and media will rightfully ask about the recent Iranian holocaust deniers conference. Below is an unpublished letter I sent to the Wall Street Journal in response to its article, "The Road to Tehran," and a 1940 Zionist offer to collaborate that I sent with it to document the accusations in the letter.
For now, it briefly states my position on the scandalous Tehran event.

Feel free to circulate this letter & Co. on the internet. For further info re. the tour, go to

or here

Stay well, give 'em hell,


LETTER To the Editor, The Wall Street Journal

In "The Road to Tehran" (12/16), Bret Stephens charged "global polite society," i.e. Israel's critics, with "blazing" our "own merry trail" to Tehran's holocaust denial conference: "Once a country's policies are deemed Nazi-like, it necessarily follows that its leaders are Nazi-like." But what if a leader proclaims himself pro-Nazi?

In 1988, Ettela'at, a Tehran daily, pirated my book, The Iron Wall: Zionist Revisionism from Jabotinsky to Shamir. Yitzhak Shamir was then Israel's Prime Minister. Ettela'at did so because I reprinted a 1940 proposal by Shamir's anti-British National Military Organization, "to actively take part in the war on Germany's side." They had assured Hitler that "the NMO is closely related to the totalitarian movements of Europe in its ideology and structure."

However my pirates were still not pleased. I wrote that six million Jews were killed, so Ettela'at added a footnote: "the number of European Jews massacred by the Nazis could not be greater than one million."

Stephens proclaims that "the road to Tehran is a well-traveled one, and among those who denounce it now are some who have already walked some part of it."
Really? Hitler fought Stalin and Stalin fought Hitler. But denouncing Stalin didn't mean walking Hitler's road, and fighting Hitler didn't mean you were a Stalinist. Similarly, exposing Zionism for its crimes doesn't mean sympathy for Shia fanaticism, and attacking Islamic despotism doesn't mean support for Israeli racism.

Lenni Brenner


This proposal to Hitler was written in late 1940, when Avraham Stern (Yair), (1907-1942), still called his movement the "real" Irgun Zvai Leumi, the National Military Organization, from which they had split earlier that year. Later they took the name Lohamei Herut Yisrael (Lehi for short), Fighters for the Freedom of Israel. They were, however, universally known by the name the British in Palestine gave them: the Stern Gang.

The document was presented to two German diplomats in 1941, in Lebanon, then run by Germany's Vichy French ally. They deposited the proposal in the German embassy in Turkey, where it was found after the war.

The Stern Gang was a distinct minority of the Zionist movement in 1940-41. But when Yitzhak Shamir, one of their leaders, became Prime Minister of Israel, in 1983, their document correctly took on enormous significance in the eyes of
all serious scholars. - LB

Fundamental Features of the Proposal of the National Military Organization in Palestine (Irgun Zvai Leumi) Concerning the Solution of the Jewish Question in Europe and the Participation of the NMO in the War on the Side of

(in) David Yisraeli, The Palestine Problem in German Politics 1889-1945, Bar
Ilan University (Ramat Gan, Israel) (1974), pp. 315-17

It is often stated in the speeches and utterances of the leading statesmen of National Socialist Germany that a prerequisite of the New Order in Europe requires the radical solution of the Jewish question through evacuation ("Jew-free Europe").

The evacuation of the Jewish masses from Europe is a precondition for solving the Jewish question; but this can only be made possible and complete through the settlement of these masses in the home of the Jewish people, Palestine, and through the establishment of a Jewish state in its historic boundaries.

The solving in this manner of the Jewish problem, thus bringing with it once and for all the liberation of the Jewish people, is the objective of the political activity and the years-long struggle of the Israeli freedom movement, the National Military Organization (Irgun Zvai Leumi) in Palestine.

The NMO, which is well-acquainted with the goodwill of the German Reich government and its authorities towards Zionist activity inside Germany and towards Zionist emigration plans, is of the opinion that:

1. Common interests could exist between the establishment of a new order in Europe in conformity with the German concept, and the true national aspirations of the Jewish people as they are embodied by the NMO.

2. Cooperation between the new Germany and a renewed folkish-national Hebraium would be possible and,

3. The establishment of the historic Jewish state on a national and totalitarian basis, bound by a treaty with the German Reich, would be in the interest of a maintained and strengthened future German position of power in the Near East.

Proceeding from these considerations, the NMO in Palestine, under the condition the above-mentioned national aspirations of the Israeli freedom movement are recognized on the side of the German Reich, offers to actively take part in the war on Germany's side.

This offer by the NMO, covering activity in the military, political and information fields, in Palestine and, according to our determined preparations, outside Palestine, would be connected to the military training and organizing of Jewish manpower in Europe, under the leadership and command of the NMO.

These military units would take part in the fight to conquer Palestine, should such a front be decided upon.

The indirect participation of the Israeli freedom movement in the New Order in Europe, already in the preparatory stage, would be linked with a positive-radical solution of the European Jewish problem in conformity with the above-mentioned national aspirations of the Jewish people. This would extraordinarily strengthen the moral basis of the New Order in the eyes of all humanity.

The cooperation of the Israeli freedom movement would also be along the lines of one of the last speeches of the German Reich Chancellor, in which Herr Hitler emphasized that he would utilize every combination and coalition in order to isolate and defeat England.


A brief general view of the formation, essence, and activity of the NMO in Palestine:

The NMO developed partly out of the Jewish self-defense in Palestine and the Revisionist movement (New Zionist Organization), with which the NMO was loosely connected through the person of Mr. V. Jabotinsky until his death.

The pro-English attitude of the Revisionist Organization in Palestine, which prevented the renewal of the personal union, led in the autumn of this year to a complete break between it and the NMO as well as to a there-upon following split in the Revisionist movement.

The goal of the NMO is the establishment of the Jewish state within its historic borders. The NMO, in contrast to all Zionist trends, rejects colonizatory infiltration as the only means of making accessible and gradually taking possession of the fatherland and practices its slogan, the struggle and the sacrifice, as the only true means for the conquest and liberation of Palestine.

On account of its militant character and its anti-English disposition the NMO is forced, under constant persecutions by the English administration, to exercise its political activity and the military training of its members in Palestine in secret.

The NMO, whose terrorist activities began as early as the autumn of the year 1936, became, after the publication of the British White Papers, especially prominent in the summer of 1939 through successful intensification of its terroristic activity and sabotage of English property. At that time these activities, as well as daily secret radio broadcasts, were noticed and discussed by virtually the entire world press.

The NMO maintained independent political offices in Warsaw, Paris. London and New York until the beginning of the war.The office in Warsaw was mainly concerned with the military organization and training of the national Zionist youth and was closely connected with the Jewish masses who, especially in Poland, sustained and enthusiastically supported, in every manner, the fight of the NMO in Palestine.

Two newspapers were published in Warsaw (The Deed and Liberated Jerusalem): these were organs of the NMO. The office in Warsaw maintained close relations with the former Polish government and those military circles, who brought greatest sympathy and understanding towards the aims of the NMO. Thus, in the year 1939 selected groups of NMO
members were sent from Palestine to Poland, where their military training was completed in barracks by Polish officers.

The negotiations, for the purpose of activating and concretizing their aid, took place between the NMO and the Polish government in Warsaw the evidence of which can easily be found in the archives of the former Polish government
were terminated because of the beginning of the war.

The NMO is closely related to the totalitarian movements of Europe in its ideology and structure.

The fighting capacity of the NMO could never be paralyzed or seriously weakened, neither through strong defensive measures by the English administration and the Arabs, nor by those of the Jewish socialists.


Co-editors: John Heathcote Seán Mac Mathúna • Consulting editor: Themistocles Hoetis